Supreme Court Justice Partying With Matt Gaetz?

( Progressive activists and some legal scholars were worried when they discovered that Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh went to a Christmas party with some well-known people on the right, like House Representative Matt Gaetz and Stephen Miller, a former adviser to President Donald Trump.

A far-left outlet reported that Matt Schlapp, the head of the American Conservative Union, and his wife, Mercedes, held the party at their home in Alexandria, Virginia.

However, the same Progressive activists and far-left media don’t find it disturbing that Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has close ties to the racist organization La Raza.

According to the National Council of La Raza, which operates through its network of nearly 300 affiliated community-based organizations, it is the most extensive national Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States.

Several chapters of the Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlán (Chicano Student Movement of Aztlán), which La Raza supports, are among these affiliates. The American Southwest, in which radical “Mechistas” are described as still belonging to Mexico, is called Aztlán. “Por La Raza todo, Fuera de La Raza nada,” which translates to “For the Race everything, outside the Race nothing,” is their catchphrase.

One chapter on the website of La Raza states that their goal is the liberation of Aztlán and the empowerment of our people.

According to a report, tens of millions of taxpayer dollars are given to La Raza to establish charter schools like the Aztlán Academy of Tucson, where students are taught “Aztec Math,” and the Mexican flag is flown instead of the American flag.

Jose Angel Guitierrez received the “Chicano of the Year” Award from La Raza in 1994. Guitierrez once remarked that the devil has pale skin and blue eyes and that they have to eliminate the Gringo. If the worst comes to the worst, we have to kill him.

According to Professor Tonja Jacobi of Atlanta’s Emory University School, Supreme Court justices should be extraordinarily careful in not only having no actual ethical difficulties but having no appearance of an ethical conundrum.