Rebel Republican Targets Trump: What It Means for Future GOP Races

Origami elephant and donkey on American flag.

A Nebraska Republican’s endorsement of an independent Senate candidate has sparked controversy and raised questions about party loyalty.

At a Glance

  • Nebraska state senator Mike McDonnell, a recent Republican convert, is supporting independent Senate candidate Dan Osborn
  • McDonnell previously opposed efforts to change Nebraska’s electoral vote allocation to favor Trump
  • The endorsement could potentially affect GOP Senate control
  • Osborn’s campaign is supported by liberal groups, indicating Democratic alignment
  • A recent poll shows Osborn trailing Republican Deb Fischer by only two points

Republican Loyalty Questioned

Nebraska state senator Mike McDonnell, who recently switched from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party in April, has raised eyebrows with his recent endorsement of independent Senate candidate Dan Osborn. This move has led to questions about McDonnell’s loyalty to the Republican Party and its goals.

“If he was really a Republican, you would think that he would do some things to demonstrate that he’s a Republican Party member,” former Omaha mayor and Nebraska Republican Rep. Hal Daub told the DCNF in an interview. “What are the things you’ve done to prove to people that you’re really a Republican?”

McDonnell’s actions have not only puzzled fellow Republicans but have also potentially jeopardized the GOP’s efforts to maintain control of the Senate. His support for Osborn, whose campaign is backed by liberal groups and uses ActBlue for fundraising, suggests a continued alignment with Democratic interests despite his party switch.

Impact on Electoral College Votes

McDonnell’s controversial stance extends beyond his Senate endorsement. He previously opposed a legislative push to change Nebraska’s electoral vote allocation to a winner-take-all system, which would have favored former President Donald Trump in the upcoming election.

“Thank God for that one guy in Omaha,” Democratic Vice Presidential nominee Tim Walz said at a campaign event in New York on Oct. 23 following McDonnell’s decision to join with Democratic lawmakers in opposing the change.

Nebraska’s current electoral system allows for a split vote, with the second congressional district being competitive and leaning Democrat. This unique system has been a point of contention among Nebraska Republicans and Trump supporters who argue for a more unified approach.

Potential Shift in Senate Control

The implications of McDonnell’s endorsement of Osborn extend beyond Nebraska’s borders. A New York Times-Siena College poll shows Osborn trailing Republican incumbent Deb Fischer by only two points, indicating a potentially tight race that could impact the balance of power in the U.S. Senate.

The outcome of this race could have significant consequences for the Republican Party’s ability to regain control of the Senate in the upcoming election. With margins this close, every seat becomes crucial in determining which party will hold the majority.

Republican Response

Nebraska’s federal delegation has expressed disappointment in McDonnell’s actions, particularly his opposition to the winner-take-all electoral system. In a joint letter, they stated their position clearly:

“It is past time that Nebraska join 48 other states in embracing winner-take-all in presidential elections,” Nebraska’s federal delegation wrote in a joint letter on Sept. 18. “After all, we are Nebraskans first, not members of Nebraska’s three congressional districts.”

This statement underscores the frustration within the Republican Party over McDonnell’s apparent lack of alignment with party goals. His failure to endorse other Republican federal delegation members or express support for Trump has only intensified these concerns.

Future Implications

As the political landscape in Nebraska continues to evolve, McDonnell’s actions may have far-reaching consequences. There are rumors that he may run for Omaha mayor against Republican incumbent Jean Stothert, further complicating his relationship with the party.

The situation in Nebraska serves as a microcosm of the broader challenges facing the Republican Party as it navigates internal divisions and strives for unity in pursuit of electoral success. As the 2024 elections approach, the party will need to address these issues to present a united front to voters.