Dems Furious Over Trump Admin’s Plans to Stop Travel From 43 Nations

Trump’s administration is taking aim at travelers from dozens of countries in a bold new security move. The sweeping visa restrictions could impact citizens from 43 nations across the Middle East, Africa, and beyond as part of efforts to protect American borders. Get ready for the left-wing meltdown!

At a glance:

• Trump administration drafts plan targeting citizens from up to 43 countries with visa restrictions

• Countries divided into “Red,” “Orange,” and “Yellow” lists based on security concerns

• 11 nations including Afghanistan, Iran, and Syria face complete travel bans

• 10 countries including Russia, Pakistan, and Haiti would see visas primarily limited to wealthy business travelers

• 22 nations given 60-day warnings to improve security measures or face restrictions

America First: New Security Measures Target High-Risk Nations

The Trump administration is moving forward with an ambitious plan to restrict travelers from dozens of countries deemed security risks. The State Department has developed a three-tiered classification system that could ultimately bar citizens from 43 countries, primarily from regions with known terrorism connections or high rates of visa violations.

Officials familiar with the proposal revealed a color-coded system separating nations into “Red,” “Orange,” and “Yellow” categories based on the severity of restrictions. According to diplomatic and security officials, 11 countries would face complete travel bans under the “Red” designation: Afghanistan, Bhutan, Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen.

The “Orange” category would include 10 nations where visas would be severely limited, primarily allowing only affluent business travelers entry to the United States. These countries include Belarus, Eritrea, Haiti, Laos, Myanmar, Pakistan, Russia, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, and Turkmenistan.

Enhanced Vetting Process Provides Second Chance

An additional 22 countries have been placed on a “Yellow” list, giving them 60 days to address American security concerns before facing potential restrictions. This grace period allows nations time to improve their security protocols, enhance information sharing with U.S. authorities, and demonstrate commitment to preventing terrorism and visa violations.

The policy aligns with Trump’s Executive Order designed to protect American citizens from foreign threats and individuals with extremist ideologies. While the list was developed by the State Department, it remains subject to review by officials from various agencies before reaching the White House for final approval.

“The Trump administration is considering targeting the citizens of as many as 43 countries as part of a new ban on travel to the United States that would be broader than the restrictions imposed during President Trump’s first term,” officials familiar with the matter stated in reports.

National security experts point out that the new approach represents a significant expansion of Trump’s previous travel ban implemented in 2017, which faced numerous legal challenges before being upheld by the Supreme Court. President Biden’s administration later lifted those restrictions, but the new proposal demonstrates Trump’s renewed commitment to border security.

Strategic Security Focus Draws Mixed Reactions

The inclusion of Russia on the “Orange” list has raised questions about geopolitical implications given American support for Ukraine during the ongoing conflict. However, administration officials emphasize that the policy is based on objective security assessments rather than political considerations. And, it could be used as a negotiating tactic, especially now given that President Vladimir Putin appears to be walking back some of his willingness to implement the ceasefire.

Notably absent from the restricted lists are major sources of legal immigration like India, suggesting the policy is targeted specifically at security threats rather than reducing overall immigration numbers. The approach allows for maintaining immigration levels by potentially replacing blocked migrants with applicants from countries that cooperate with American security requirements.

Progressive critics have voiced opposition to the plan – as you’d expect – arguing for individualized assessment of visa applicants rather than country-wide restrictions. But can you imagine how much time and resources that would take?