President Biden extends national emergencies for Iran and Sudan, citing persistent security threats and unresolved crises. The move underscores ongoing challenges in U.S. foreign policy and raises questions about the extent of executive power.
At a Glance
- Biden extends national emergencies for Iran and Sudan due to persistent security threats
- Iran’s emergency status has been in place since 1979, Sudan’s since 2006
- Extensions granted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)
- Move highlights ongoing challenges in U.S. foreign policy
- Some critics view these extensions as potential overreach of executive authority
Longstanding Emergencies
The national emergency with Iran, first declared on November 14, 1979, has been a constant fixture in U.S. foreign policy for over four decades. Similarly, the emergency status with Sudan, initially declared in April 2006, reflects enduring concerns about regional stability and U.S. interests in Northeast Africa.
In extending these emergencies, President Biden cited the “unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the situation in Iran.” The White House further elaborated on the Iran situation, stating, “Relations with Iran have not yet normalized, and the process of implementing the agreements with Iran, dated January 19, 1981, is ongoing. For this reason, the national emergency declared on November 14, 1979, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond November 14, 2024.”
U.S. extends additional national emergencies related to Iran, Sudan https://t.co/RaZZ6GNbVe
— Just the News (@JustTheNews) November 4, 2024
The situation in Sudan has evolved over the years, with various executive orders addressing different aspects of the crisis. The most recent expansion in May 2023 was prompted by the military’s seizure of power in October 2021 and subsequent inter-service fighting in April 2023, underscoring the volatile nature of Sudan’s political landscape.
I was pleased to host a diverse group of investors to launch the Angel Investor Network as part of @POTUS' Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity. We welcome their pledge of more than $1B in early-stage investments for entrepreneurs in Latin America & the Caribbean by 2030. pic.twitter.com/PuGisVuxds
— Jake Sullivan (@JakeSullivan46) July 18, 2024
Implications and Controversies
The extensions of these national emergencies are made possible by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977, which grants the president extensive powers to address perceived threats. However, the use of these powers has not been without controversy. Some critics view the repeated extensions of national emergencies as an overreach of federal authority and potentially unconstitutional.
As of January 15, 2024, U.S. presidents have issued 69 national emergencies under the IEEPA, with 39 still ongoing. The longevity of these emergencies, particularly the one with Iran lasting over four decades, raises questions about the nature of “emergency” powers and their place in long-term foreign policy strategies.
The extensions also highlight the complex and often intractable nature of international conflicts and U.S. foreign policy challenges. As the Biden administration continues to navigate these long standing issues, the use of executive powers to address them remains a subject of debate among policymakers and constitutional scholars alike.
